Thursday, September 3, 2020

Business Law for Australian Taxation Administration- myassignmenthelp

Question: Examine about thBusiness Law for Australian Taxation Administration. Answer: What is the job of an ATO as an official body? According to the given case, Ms Anstis has guaranteed a finding in the annual assessment payable against her childhood remittance salary. The ATO has denied furnishing her with such reasonings. Ms Anstis documented under the watchful eye of the government court of Australia and got a request for her. The ATO recorded an intrigue under the steady gaze of the High Court of Australia. The Australian Taxation Administration is managing charge framework in Australia. According to the TA Act 1953, the ATO goes about as the official body under the enactment and direct the conduct of the citizens in the nation. The Australian Taxation Office is the principle income assortment body of the Australian government. The ATO is the legal body of the administration who has been given the force under the Australian Taxation Administration Act, 1953 to gather charges in various assessment framework inside the nation (Alghamdi et al 2016). The ATO has the duty to execute and actualize the expense framework inside the nation and some other issue identified with tax collection and assortment of government income inside the nation. As an official body the ATO is to execute, actualize and manage the expense framework inside the nation and control the conduct of duty defaulters and dodgers in the nation (Vann 2016). Does it make law? The ATO is an official body shaped under the Taxation Administration Act of the nation. The parliament has given authority under the Act to figure certain approaches and guidelines for the everyday smooth running of the tax assessment framework in the nation (Tran-Nam and Walpole 2016). ATO doesn't make legal establishments however has the ability to make rules and guidelines under the tax assessment framework in Australia. ATO connects with and includes with other tax collection divisions on strategy matters identifying with assessment and extract. The ATO has been allowed with power by the administration to teach the OPC to get ready enactment which the ATO considers fit and important to manage the tax collection framework inside Australia (Braithwaite 2017). How does this case mirror the communication of the various bodies under the partition of forces convention? According to the given realities of the case there is an association of all the three levels of the administration. The three levels of the administration are the council, the official and the legal executive. The Australian Federal Parliament and the state lawmaking body are the authoritative body that makes laws on the tax assessment framework inside the nation (Smith et al 2016). The ATO is been assigned with the intensity of overseeing and regulating the tax collection framework inside the nation. The ATO is the official body of the three level arrangement of the legislature. Though the Federal Court of Australia and the High Court is the legal body of the nation who choose matters in question. In this given case, the ATO has capacity to decide the assessment framework and High Court has the ability to decipher the laws made by the parliament. Consequently every one of the three levels are independent from one another. Be that as it may, every one of the three levels of the admin istration has something regular to each to keep a check n the forces of other body. According to the case, here the legal executive by deciphering the law has beware of utilizing the total force on the general individuals of the nation (Long Campbell and Kelshaw 2016). What is the criticalness of the High Court choice as far as duty law as it is applied inside Australia? The hugeness of the High Courts choice on the given case is that the High Court has the ability to establish that the lower court has given the proper judgment according to the realities of the case. Reference: Alghamdi, A. what's more, Rahim, M., 2016. Improvement of a Measurement Scale for User Satisfaction with E-charge Systems in Australia. InTransactions on Large-Scale Data-and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXVII(pp. 64-83). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Vann, R.J., 2016. Crossover Entities in Australia: Resource Capital Fund III LP Case. Tran-Nam, B. what's more, Walpole, M., 2016. Duty debates, suit expenses and access to burden justice.eJournal of Tax Research,14(2), p.319. Braithwaite, V. ed., 2017.Taxing popular government: Understanding duty shirking and avoidance. Routledge. Smith, F., Smillie, K., Fitzsimons, J., Lindsay, B., Wells, G., Marles, V., Hutchinson, J., OHara, B., Perrigo, T. what's more, Atkinson, I., 2016. Changes required to the Australian duty framework to improve biodiversity protection on private land.Environmental and arranging law journal,33(5), pp.443-450. Long, B., Campbell, J. what's more, Kelshaw, C., 2016. The equity focal point on tax collection strategy in Australia.St Mark's Review, (235), p.94.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Additional Aircraft Feasibility Study :: Essays Papers

Extra Aircraft Feasibility Study Introduction I have been the head avionics division supervisor of First North Bank since 1985. This bank has branches in Waterloo, IA; Springfield, MO; Fayetteville, AK; and Colorado Springs, CO. For as long as 12 years the organization has been working an eight traveler King Air B-200 that at present has 2500 flying hours on the edge. First North Bank has as of late procured Banks R Us (most likely due to the unpleasant name) and will grow their tasks significantly. They will be changing the name of Banks R Us to the First North Bank name at the accompanying areas: Madison, WI; Wilmington, NC; Lakeland, FL; Amarillo, TX; and Medford, OR. I have now been alloted by my CEO to do a possibility study to decide whether the expansion of an airplane will profit the organization. Presentation The reason for this examination is to decide the achievability of adding extra airplane to the enterprises flying office. This examination will present what airplane the organization is as of now utilizing, how it is being utilized, and the present structure of the avionics division. A nitty gritty investigation will be introduced on the costs and expenses of every airplane just as a suggestion of what airplane ought to be bought or rented. A recently evolved structure of the flight division will be introduced alongside another suggested arrangement for the utilization of the airplane. The examination will at that point close with a summarize of the considerable number of proposals. Current Aircraft The organization is presently working a 1985 Beechcraft King Air B-200. This airplane is a propeller fly airplane. The meaning of a propeller stream airplane is that the motor is a fly that drives a propeller. The propellers turn at a steady rate and speed changes are made by modifying the point of the propeller. The airplane seats eight travelers to incorporate the pilot’s seat. The whole airplane is in generally excellent condition with just 2500 flight hours on it and has the capability of providing a lot more long periods of difficulty free help with appropriate maintainace. The presentation charteristiccs of this airplane is as per the following: Beech King Air B200 Characteristics PERFORMANCE U.S. METRIC Max Cruise Speed (336 mph) 292 kt 541 kph Ensured Ceiling 35,000 ft 10,668 m

Friday, August 21, 2020

Second Chances to Make a Sure Thing Essay Example

Renewed opportunities to Make a Sure Thing Essay The imagery of the chime implying a new beginning, a genuine opportunity to have a fresh start and make your own fate, was splendid in my eyes. One of my preferred lines in the play was certainly when Bill stated, You need to hit these things at the correct second or its awful (1121). Sure Thing by David Ives The Play Sure Thing from David Ives looks at the unlimited varieties of kid meet young lady and the following conversation starters. The focal subject all through the play shows a couple of assortments of a potential discussion that end with a ringing ringer that represents a new beginning and another opportunity to establish a decent connection. The quick discussions start in a café with the two primary and just characters are Bill and Betty. From the earliest starting point till the finish of the play one can see a progression of conversation starters, from a man to a lady sitting in a coffeehouse perusing. The lines begin short and quick with an identical short reaction from the lady. Like a fight, two individuals out on the town reliably skip around determined exposition between one another, attempting to make sense of the rivals â€Å"weaknesses. This thought shows itself in writing in such functions as David Ives play Sure Thing, a piece utilizing fast fire lines between a person and a young lady becoming more acquainted with one another. In any case, this topic isn't constantly pervasive in positive exchange, as in Tennessee Williams A Street Car Named Desire, Blanche and Stanley don't go out on the town or appreciate any sentimental discourse, however battle each other for incomparability of the house and Stellas fr iendship. Albeit a boxing musicality is being forced on Sure Thing, the diligent battling among Stanley and Blanche in A Street Car Named Desire can be deciphered to have a comparable mood. We will compose a custom exposition test on Second Chances to Make a Sure Thing explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom article test on Second Chances to Make a Sure Thing explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom article test on Second Chances to Make a Sure Thing explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer Despite the fact that these two writings are apparently inverse in disposition and plot, the â€Å" boxing rhythm† spans this gorge through the cadence of the exchange between these characters. In Ives’ Sure Thing, a person, Bill, and a young lady, Betty, â€Å"duke it out† trying to become more acquainted with one another and, eventually, succumb to one another. So as to do this, they convey brisk jokes between one another, like the convulsive punches of a fight. Obviously, there is no noticeable or striking proof of boxing inside the content, however the musicality of the exchange can be gathered to impersonate the movements of a bout. The discourse is snappy, unequivocal and brief, like the hits and stages a fighter utilizes in a battle. There are a few inquiries rehashed also, as the person or young lady has, as a result, halted the beat and said an inappropriate thing. For example, in one vignette Betty gets some information about his affection life and the exchange is punctuated by the sound of a â€Å"bell† which further fortifies the boxing subject: Bill: That’s an exceptionally decent offer, but†¦ Betty: Uh-huh. Sweetheart? Bill: Two, really. One of them’s pregnant, and Stephanie-(Bell). Betty: Girlfriend? Bill: No, I don’t have a sweetheart. Not in the event that you mean the maiming bitch I dumped the previous evening. (Ringer). (Ives 13) In this selection, the exchange is speedy and concise, similar to the punches tossed in a fight. This couple takes â€Å"jabs† at one another through talk rather than physical punching. Each time a round is finished, the chime rings, representing an impasse for the exchange between the Bill and Betty. Proposals â€Å"rounds† are predominant in A Street Car Named Desire among Stanley and Blanche, regardless of not being a couple or commonly keen on one another. With the loft filling in as the setting for this â€Å"fight†, Stanley and Blanche box it out while the remainder of the characters are once in a while consigned to onlookers all through the story. Like Sure Thing, there is no substantial â€Å"boxing ring† or anything having to do with boxing. Rather, Williams infuses this musicality inside the discourse between these characters, making an expressive contrast of animosity, viciousness and infidelity. Actually, Stanley and Blanche drive the Streetcar Named Desire through the play, doling out bitterness, desire and doubt at one another. Blanche is a glamorized however frustrated lady. She makes creations and fabrications of a gaudy life around her to displace her genuine conditions. Stanley is the exemplification of machismo, keen on just the fundamental delights, which are corresponding to what a basic creature appreciates. Stella, Stanley’s spouse, is the middle person among Blanche and Stanley, however she at last bombs in keeping these two from verbal or, later, physical brutality. Basically, Blanche incites the â€Å"fight† by entering the condo and attempting to usurp Stanley’s rule, which is somewhat included Stella’s love and consideration. Without seeing Stanley, Stella quickly evaluates him and buys in to the possibility that the Polish areâ€Å" not really high-brow† (23). There is an exchange among Stanley and Stella about Stanley, expressing: Stella: Stanley is Polish, you know. Blanche: Oh, yes. They’re something like Irish, aren’t they? †¦Only not really highbrow? †¦Is he so-unique? Stella: Yes. An alternate species†¦He’s out and about a decent arrangement. Blanche: Oh. Voyages? Stella: Yes. Blanche: Good. I mean-isn’t it? (Williams 23-25) Blanche as of now tosses a â€Å"low punch† at Stanley’s validity without him in any event, knowing. She is considerably increasingly spurred by the way that he voyages at times, which could give her numerous chances to mope to Stella about her issues and gradually deteriorate Stanley’s control of the condo. All through the play, she keeps on pestering Stanleys characteristics, for example, calling attention to that she has not â€Å"noticed the stamp of virtuoso even on Stanleys forehead† (Williams 50). Be that as it may, Blanche has endured lost riches and of respect, even more motivation behind why she would search for comfort in her â€Å"precious little sister†, who is given the assignment of keeping up harmony between the two. Before Stanley is because of meet Blanche, Stella turns into a â€Å"referee†, asking her better half to â€Å"Try to get her and be pleasant to her†¦and appreciate her dress and advise her she’s looking brilliant. That’s essential to Blanche, its her little weakness† (Williams 33). Like any great arbitrator in a bout, Stella can foresee unsafe contact among Stanley and Blanche, so she has arranged a few â€Å"rules† for Stanley to follow. She has just advised Blanche to see Stanley as he is and to not differentiate him to other men. Since the principles have been advised to every contender, what is not yet clear in the play are the genuine punches tossed between these two enthusiastic characters. In the primary match between these two, Stanley stands up to Blanche about the archives of her lost bequest, Belle Reve. Be that as it may, Stanley begins by seeing the costly hides that are in Blanche’s bag: Stanley: It appears as though you attacked some trendy shops in Paris†¦What does it cost for a string of hide pieces that way? Blanche: Why, those were a tribute from an admirer of mine! †¦Oh, in my childhood I energized some esteem. In any case, take a gander at me now!.. I was looking for a commendation Stanley. Stanley: I don’t go for that stuff†¦Some men are took in by this Hollywood marvelousness stuff and a few men are most certainly not. Blanche: You’re basic, clear and fair, a smidgen on the crude side I should think. (Williams 38-40) Stanley starts to investigate Blanche about her advantages however Blanche counters with moving the center onto his crude side. She digs into his own life, examining each piece for something to hold against him. Blanche wins this round in light of the fact that she abstains from discussing Belle Reve, bypassing the issue by changing the center a few times from Stanley to her lost love. In centering through the forced â€Å"boxing† focal point utilized in Sure Thing, a creative viewpoint can be shaped. The boxing musicality is clear through the discourse, as Blanche and Stanley swing jokes to and fro at one another, which are equivalent to the little hits tossed toward the beginning of a battle. For this situation, the â€Å"bell† that splits up the battle is a mix of the hot blues piano outside and Stanley spilling out the news that Stella is having a child. The second round, however short, shows who commands the condo and Stellas love. While Stanley is playing a game of cards with his companions, Blanche chooses to turn on a radio. Stanley furiously turns it off, yet Blanche has the boldness to walk out on. Like a bout effectively a couple of rounds in, the two warriors go to and fro at one another until one of them can break the monotonous chain of â€Å"punches† and adopt an alternate strategy. Stanley hurls the radio out the window, and charges after Stella. Blanche is helpless as she is stunned at this presentation of â€Å"lunacy†. Stanley routs Blanche in this round on the grounds that he directs the beat of the house through controlling the radio. In a similar occurrence, he assumes responsibility for the match among himself and Stella, reminding Blanche who administers the loft. Any delight that Blanche could have appreciated in the loft is tossed out the window alongside the â€Å"radio†, the main other bit of proof of an outside world in the condo. Blanche has an inclination for music, so when Stanley disposes of th

Saturday, June 6, 2020

The Universe According to Whitman Unity through Disjunction - Literature Essay Samples

Walt Whitman’s poetry contains many basic elements that come together to characterize his own stance in 19th century social and political thought. An analysis of Whitman’s â€Å"Song of Myself† and â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† specifically highlight Whitman’s concern with the human body. Through these poems, the human body is continually glorified and eroticized by Whitman. However, Whitman’s focus on the body runs deeper than a physical infatuation, as these poems also establish the body’s connection to one’s soul. Another major characteristic in Whitman’s concern with the human body in these poems is his ability to universalize the human image, bringing the reader and poet into a single entity. This paper seeks to demonstrate how Whitman’s union of these highly connective representations of the human body allow readers a circuit to understanding Whitman’s own response to the social and political separa tism that characterized 19th century thought. Writing in an era of radical inequality, Whitman’s characterization of the body in these poems serves to promote a larger message of social and racial equality in a time period that worked to largely suppress both. Upon initial analysis of Whitman’s focus on the human body in â€Å"Song of Myself† and â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† explicit descriptions of eroticism run prevalent. These poems place a large emphasis the juxtaposition of sensual yet sacred descriptions of human anatomy and sexual unions. I argue, however, that these striking images work to serve a larger purpose in Whitman’s message of a human unity and commonality that his poetry represents. For example, Whitman establishes a profound love and respect for the human body â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric,† stating, â€Å"[The body] of the male is perfect, and that of the female is perfect† (I Sing the Body Electric 10). This s entiment is also expressed in â€Å"Song of Myself,† as Whitman again uses sensuous terms to describe a sense of perfection that is found in every human body. For example, he describes a slave in one scene, stating, â€Å"His blue shirt exposes his ample neck and breast and loosens over his hip band, / His glance is calm and commanding†¦ / The sun falls on his crispy hair and mustache, falls on the black of his / polish’d and perfect limbs† (â€Å"Song of Myself 224-229). Descriptions such of this fill Whitman’s poems and it is clear that he puts a profound respect and admiration for the human form—regardless of sex or race. William White’s critical essay, â€Å"Walt Whitman’s erotic poetry: New as foam and old as the rock† agrees with this argument as he refers to to â€Å"Whitman’s cosmic view of love as a force which permeates all living things, which lends dignity and glory to the human body, and which unabash edly proclaims sex and procreation as the true Spring of the life-cycle† (White 654). Another example of Whitman’s continued emphasis on the glorified image of the human body occurs in â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† in the linesThe man’s body is sacred, and the woman’s body is sacred; / No matter who it is, it is sacred; /Is it a slave? Is it one of the dull-faced immigrants just landed on the wharf? /Each belongs here or anywhere, just as much as the well-off—just as much as you; / Each has his or her place in the procession. / (All is a procession; / The universe is a procession, with measured and beautiful motion) /(â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† 83-89). By Whitman’s focus on the body forming what he frequently describes as a sacred entity, he again draws the focus to a commonality that he claims is shared by all of human-kind by forcing readers to see the â€Å"larger picture:† a universe that supersedes physical d istinctions. â€Å"Do you not see that these [bodies] are exactly the same to all, in all nations and times, all over / the Earth? / If any thing is sacred, the human body is sacred† (â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric 123-125), Whitman later adds. This focus on an identical sacredness found within each individual supports an analysis that shows that a universality of all human beings exists outside of temporary physical restrictions, which are essentially meaningless in Whitman’s view of the universe. In addition, Whitman’s erotic undertones in his poems focus on a wide range of male, and female manifestations of love. In â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric,† for example, readers can find an explicit description of a male and female involved in a sexual act as the speaker states, Ebb stung by the flow, and flow stung by the ebb—love-flesh swelling and deliciously aching; /Limitless limpid jets of love hot and enormous, quivering jelly of love, white-blo w and / delirious juice; / Bridegroom night of love, working surely and softly into the prostrate dawn;/ †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..This is the nucleus—after the child is born of women, the man is born of woman; / This is the bath of birth—this is the merge of small and large, and the outlet again / (â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† lines 58-65). Lines such as these leave readers little question as to the substance that the speaker describes, yet they also operate on a deeper level than physical infatuation. It is Whitman’s focus on the necessity of sexual unions for the continuance of life that gives his erotic descriptions depth and a greater cause. â€Å"It is really a peculiar form of eroticism which begins with the miracle of all life, especially the human body, and which conceives of all forms of love as existing and expanding as the primal life force and as an indicator of the infinite pote ntial of the democratic ideal and the harmonious evolution of the universe toward ever-increasing greatness,† (White 651) adds White. Thus, a close look at Whitman’s writing demonstrates that the insertion of erotic scenes and description were not simply for the sake of themselves, but a mere piece to a larger definition of â€Å"love† that his writing sought to establish. By interpreting Whitman’s physical representation of sexual acts as the promotion of a higher ideal, readers can also understand the significance of the numerous homosexual descriptions that are found within his poetry. In â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric,† for example, readers are exposed to a scene in which â€Å"two lusty apprentice-boys† engage in an act of homosexuality. The speaker states, The coats and caps thrown down, the embrace of love and resistance, / The upper-hold and the under-hold, the hair rumpled over and blinding the eyes/ The march of firemen in their own costumes, the play of masculine muscle through clean/-setting trowsers and waist-straps, / (â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† lines 25-30). Intense descriptive scenes of homosexuality such as this have prompted many critics to label Whitman himself as a homosexual. However, to analyze the text along the lines of Whitman’s promotion of human equality and â€Å"love† as defined as the materialization of all human interaction, it appears fitting to offer scenes such as this. Again, White’s essay agrees with this sentiment. It states, â€Å"[Whitman’s] intent seems to be to elevate love to a new level and to view it as symbolic of democratic equalitarianism. Admittedly, many of the poems stress the body, sex, and physical love as a part of nature and as a part of a life-style celebration. They depict more than mere passion†¦ almost all of Whitman’s poetry is a ‘love’ poem in the larger sense of the word’† (White 652-653). According to this translation, then, readers can make sense of Whitman’s various descriptions of homosexuality to bolster his theme of human equality. In a world where the spiritual and physical are almost merged, sexual unions take on a new definition; sexual barriers are no longer relevant. Building upon Whitman’s use of sexuality to deploy his personal message, Whitman also works through expressing the unity between body and soul and the enormous personal power this connection grants individuals. This message of unity is especially significant as it allows readers to expel traditional 19th century views of the physical distinction between races and sexes that worked to put one individual above another and instead turn to a radical response that ‘leveled’ the ground for all human beings. Both â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† and â€Å"Song of Myself† focus on how people are inextricably one and the same—posing a message th at though our bodies may be different, it is the inherent connection to the human soul that creates equality. Stating, â€Å"Be not ashamed, women—your privilege encloses the rest, and is the exit of the rest; / You are the gates of the body, and you are the gates of the soul/ â€Å"(I Sing the Body Electric 66-67), Whitman utilizes females as an example of the connectivity between the body and soul to foster a unity and equality of human-kind, helping to bring down sexual barriers that so defined 19th century thought and practice. Adding to this concept, â€Å"Song of Myself† also works to elucidate Whitman’s combining of body and soul to create the sacred vision of humanity as it directly states this theme in the lines â€Å"I have said that the soul is not more than the body, / And I have said that the body is not more than the soul, / And nothing, not God, is greater to one that one’s self is† (â€Å"Song of Myself 1269-1271). Through Whitma n’s continued focus on the connection between the human body and soul, readers can gain a sense of unity that Whitman illustrates in every aspect of his poetry. â€Å"Not only are the body and soul completely equal† adds critic Arthur Wrobel in his essay, â€Å"Whitman and the Phrenologists: The Divine Body and the Sensuous Soul,† but â€Å"there is no essential distinction between the two† (Wrobel 20). As a result, it is this purposeful ‘non-distinction’ that works to promote a universal equality that Whitman sees in each individual.In addition to Whitman’s already inextricable link he has set between the body and the soul, I pose to argument that Whitman’s poetry also universalizes the poet himself to readers, and by implication, readers share and are receptive to his message. This universality of the poet again provides a message of the commonality between the poet and the masses, reinforcing the theme of a ‘shared†™ human spirit. As a result, this message of a â€Å"unique unity† through multitude decreases the importance of the racial, social or political divides that dominated this era. For example, Whitman immediately asserts this universal theme of a poet-reader identification stating â€Å"I celebrate myself , and what I assume, you should assume. For any atom in me, as good belongs to you† (â€Å"Song of Myself† 1-4) to alert readers that his thoughts are in essence theirs. By extending his words and ideas to invite readers to directly share the sentiment, Whitman’s message of the universal human body can take root. He later shows this notion in the lines, â€Å"These are really the thoughts of all men in all ages and lands, / they are not original with me, / If they are not yours as much as mine they are nothing, or next to nothing, /† (â€Å"Song of Myself 354-356). By assigning to readers a shared responsibility in his words, Whitman works not simply to express his theory of a physical and spiritual human unity, but ensures to readers that through this unity, they too are part of the claim. According to Wrobel’s article, â€Å"Whitman’s own vision of the universe†¦ stresses its underlying unity, a unity characterized by the exquisite adaptation of all its parts to form an orderly whole,† (Wrobel 18). In this sense, just as Whitman imagined and described a harmony in the physical anatomy between all human beings, this equality also expands to encompass his view of the universe at large.Whitman’s decision in both â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† and â€Å"Song of Myself† to add lines that simply list parts of the human anatomy go into this concept that these parts, though unique in appearance, are universal. Inserting one of these anatomical lists in â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric,† the speaker describes shared â€Å"Strong set[s] of thighs, well carrying the trunk abov e, / Leg-fibres, knee, knee-pan, upper-leg, under leg, / Ankles, instep, foot-ball, toes, toe-joints, the heel; /† (â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric lines 146-150). In the ensuing line, Whitman directly adds his theme, stating, â€Å"All attitudes, all the shapeliness, all the belongings of my or your body, or of any one’s / body, male or female / . . . O I say, these are not the parts and poems of the Body only, but of the Soul, / O I saw now these are the Soul!† (â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric 147 – 165). Whitman’s crucial decision to end his poem on a sensationalized note of the universality of the physical body and the connectivity to the souls serves as a testament to his radical 19th century world view; it demonstrates unity in the face of what originally appear to be individual differences.Whitman’s writing again asserts the image of a universalized poet through his numerous direct statements that place himself not simply alongside th e reader, but within the reader himself. Claiming to be â€Å"the poet of the woman the same as the man,† and later stating, â€Å"I know every one of you, I know the sea of torment, doubt, despair and / unbelief/ †¦ I take my place among you as much as among any / The past is the push of you, me, all, precisely the same /† (â€Å"Song of Myself† 1113 – 1118), again, Whitman stresses the universal element to himself and his message. Through these lines, Whitman is asserting a commonality between not simply the poet and reader, but between the reader and the rest of society. Though Whitman’s poetry does not appear to send shock-waves to the modern reader, this idea of a â€Å"many in one† type of society in which human beings are essentially equal pieces in a larger functioning whole was a radical thought in disjointed 19th century society. According to Peter Simonson’s essay, â€Å"A Rhetoric for Polytheistic Democracy: Walt Whi tman’s ‘Poem of Many in One,† Whitman published Leaves of Grass at a time of national fracture, and â€Å"through poetic free verse, he hoped to do what traditional political institutions seemed incapable of doing: refresh the nation’s democratic faith and bind the many together as one† (Simonson 355-356). Thus, looking at â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† and â€Å"Song of Myself† as cohesive wholes illuminates a much larger philosophical issue to address in universal human equality. Whitman calls upon readers to not simply recognize this, but take it upon themselves to find a place for the world’s variety. This, agrees Simonson, is a fundamentally democratic ideal (Simonson 369). His poetry was not simply an illustration of human equality, but through its establishment of a poet-reader unity, it became a direct plea that sought reader involvement.As was traditional in 19th century thought, there was an overwhelming concern with â€Å"the Other.† However, Whitman transcends this status quo through his poetry’s continued focus on what Simoneson describes as â€Å"the kaleidoscopic variety†¦ of the 1850s United States†¦ including those derided, despised or the subjects of disinterest† (Simonson 371). This exact sentiment is spoken almost directly by Whitman in â€Å"Song of Myself† in the lines, Not a mutineer walks handcuff’d to jail but I am handcuff’d to him and / walk by his side, †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Not a youngster is taken for larceny but I go up too, and am tried and / sentenced / †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.Askers embody themselves in me and I am embodied in them/ (â€Å"Song of Myself 952-958).Whitman’s statement of identification with criminals, those who are considered to be at the lowest wrings of society illustrates his poetry’s true appeal to all members of American society, no matter how marginal. As a result, both â€Å"Song of Myself† and â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† can be read as a strong response to 19th century logic that work through â€Å"deepening our habits of tolerance and receptivity, and creating moments of contact and pluralistic commonality with the resistances that mark this world of the many† (Simonson 373). The fact that Whitman uses the human body to portray this point, especially during an era in which differentiation was so discriminated against supports the argument that he utilized the body as a tool for elucidating his deeper social message. Though an initial look at what Simonson has dubbed â€Å"habits of tolerance and receptivity†¦ and pluralistic commonality† the viewpoint does not appear different or in the least bit radical. However, Whitman’s decision to take on a world view that connects and equates all human beings and weave it into poetry during the late 1800s, the concept itself becomes completely new. In an American society based around physical differences, especially as applied to women and blacks, this message of the glorified and even eroticized individual is an extremely radical response to the events of the era. By delineating his focus to the human form—the splendor and beauty in each individual’s anatomy and the universal implications of sexuality—Whitman expresses his social stance in a unique way. The body, to Whitman, is the center of humankind’s important place in the universe, and to recognize the power of the body, one must recognize the soul. As exemplified in â€Å"I Sing the Body Electric† and â€Å"Song of Myself,† the body—regardless of how it looks—is connected directly to one’s soul, and it is through this that Whitman believes all human beings are radically equal. Through this ironic focus on the bod y—which was used to discriminate and divide during this period—Whitman is able to send a social message to this dissenting era: the undying equality shared by the human race.

Sunday, May 17, 2020

Cultural Relativism Essay - 1398 Words

Cultural relativism, pioneered in 1906 by sociologist William Graham Sumner, introduces the idea that there is no universal code of ethics. In The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, written by James Rachels, Rachels explains and challenges the ideas presented by Sumner in cultural relativism. Rachels explains, Cultural relativism is the doctrine that all moral values derive entirely from individual cultural codes, and that there are no objective, independently correct moral values. In other words, there are no absolute truths about what is right and wrong because judgements of right and wrong are all relative to a given culture. Rachels starts by explaining how different cultures have different moral codes. For example, the Greeks†¦show more content†¦The arguments are as follows: Different societies have different moral codes. The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society; that is, if the moral code of a society says that a certain action is right, that that action is right, at least within that society. There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one society s codes better than another s. In other words, there is no universal truth in ethics; there are no moral truths that hold for all people at all times. The moral code of our own society has no special status; it is merely one among many. It is mere arrogance for us to try to judge the conduct of other peoples. We should adopt an attitude of tolerance toward the practices of other cultures. Rachels points out that these ideals may seem to be adequate at first glance, but may actually be contradictory of each other. Numbers two and five, for example, could contradict the other (Rachels 463). He also begins to talk about the form of argument that cultural relativists present. All arguments they present deal with appealing to our morality and tolerance, and the presentation of the argument does not actually follow the conclusion of the argument. He also points out that the conclusion may not necessarily be false, but it simply does not follow the premise presented initially. Overall, Rachels main problem with cultural relativism is that it does not have validShow MoreRelatedCultural Relativism Essay1702 Words   |  7 Pagessociety, cultural relativism is an acceptable theory to adhere to. A society is a collective group of people who are either figuratively or literally aggregated together. There are many societies, sub-societies, and communities that are overlapping. At the same time, every living individual in the world makes up an umbrella society or community that constructs the present-day society. In â€Å"The Challenge of Cultural Relativism,† James Rachels claims that there are consequences to accepting cultural relativismRead MoreMeta-Ethical Cultural Relativism Essay737 Words   |  3 PagesMeta-Ethical Cultural Relativism The thesis of meta-ethical cultural relativism is the philosophical viewpoint that there are no absolute moral truths, only truths relative to the cultural context in which they exist. From this it is therefore presumed that what one society considers to be morally right, another society may consider to be morally wrong, therefore, moral rights and wrongs are only relative to a particular society. Thus cultural relativism implies that what is good is whatRead MoreEssay on Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism667 Words   |  3 Pagescontrast ETHNOCENTRISM and CULTURAL RELATIVISM. Discuss how you have experienced OR witnessed both concepts in our American Society. Ethnocentrism is viewing your own culture as more superior than any other culture, that all other groups are measured in relation to one’s own. Ethnocentrism can lead to cultural misinterpretation and it often distorts communication between human beings. + while cultural relativism is the concept that the importance of a particular cultural idea varies from one societyRead More Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Essay example506 Words   |  3 PagesEthnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are two contrasting terms that are displayed by different people all over the world. Simply put, ethnocentrism is defined as â€Å"judging other groups from the perspective of one’s own cultural point of view.† Cultural relativism, on the other hand, is defined as â€Å"the view that all beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the situation, environment, and individual.† Each of these ideasRead MoreEvaluate †©Rachels †©Arguments †©Against †©Cultural†© Relativism Essay1682 Words   |  7 PagesPHIL1001 ESSAY Evaluate†©Rachels†©arguments†©against†©cultural†©relativism.†©Is†©he†©right†©to†©endorse†© objective†©moral†©realism? DINH NAM TRAN 308213904 Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. â€Å"Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought† Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives inRead MoreThe Fundamental Claim of Cultural Relativism Essay example1270 Words   |  6 PagesCultural relativism is an axiom to which some individuals use to govern if an act is morally wrong or right. It is considered a subspecies of the theory of moral relativism as it essentially follows the same path but just considers a more narrow approach. Putting Schafer-Landau’s Argument from disagreement into context for cultural relativism, looks to disprove the theory, however I will demonstrate how it is flawed. Schafer-Landau’s Argument from disagreement states: P1: If well informed, open mindedRead MoreSocial Contract Theory and Cultural Relativism Essay2184 Words   |  9 Pages Thomas Hobbes’s social contract theory is minimally related to that of cultural relativism. Both deal with human nature and the search for peace. But while cultural relativism is in some ways a noteworthy theory, the social contract theory is the only one of the two that could logically work in an active environment. Cultural relativism theorizes that the best way for different societies to function together at peace is for them to recognize that each culture must be allowed its own systemRead MoreEssay on The Cultural Differences Argument for Moral Relativism1299 Words   |  6 PagesRuth Villagra The Cultural Differences Argument for Moral Relativism. Moral Relativism is generally used to describe the differences among various cultures that influence their morality and ethics. According to James Rachels, because of moral relativism there typically is no right and wrong and briefly states : â€Å"Different cultures have different moral codes.† (Rachels, 18) Various cultures perceive right and wrong differently. What is considered right in one society could be considered wrongRead MoreCultural Relativism Essay1108 Words   |  5 PagesIs cultural relativism good for our society? Cultural relativism is a belief where there are no absolute moral views or beliefs can be apply to all cultures, which makes â€Å"right† and â€Å"wrong† different in every society; what is considered â€Å"right† in one society may be considered â€Å"wrong† in another. Since no universal standard of morality exists, no one has the right to judge another society’s customs. If this belief is held true, then every culture will have their own set of â€Å"rules† to live byRead MoreCultural Relativism Essay938 Words   |  4 PagesULTURAL RELATIVISM 2 Introduction This paper aims to address several ethical questions, especially regarding Cultural Relativism which typically outlines why values and morals in human communities are deemed appropriate. Further, the paper discusses how cultural relativism is used to justify bribes in Mexico and whether this is ethical or not. Each country may view bribery under different societal conditions and circumstances. In most cases, nations with different cultural backgrounds will posses

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Handmaid Character Analysis - 1475 Words

Throughout most of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, Moira is a character who refuses to be beaten down and conform to the new society that Gilead had created. She is one of only characters that is referred to by her real name, and this is because Moira never really becomes a Handmaid like the others. In lieu of the passivity that the other Handmaid’s come to have, she fights back against the new system. Her resistance can be seen not only in her attitude while she is a Handmaid, but in her two attempts at escape as well. Moira’s refusal to conform to the society that the Republic of Gilead created represents the rebellious spirit of humanity, as well as how an oppressive society such as Gilead can break even the strongest of†¦show more content†¦This didn’t change even after stricter rules were in place, as when Moira was first brought to the gymnasium she wore a blue sweatshirt along with jeans, along with sporting a short haircu t (71). Once the Republic of Gilead was formed, the pressure to conform to society’s new rules was harshly enforced. However, this didn’t stop Moira from continuing to rebel in whatever ways that she was able. She was the polar opposite of what the majority of the Handmaids were like, as all of the other Handmaids that have been introduced were seen to be very reserved and many had even accepted their new role in life. These characteristics were the exact opposite of Moira’s, with her attempting to escape two times during her stint as a Handmaid. After Moira was caught during her first attempt at escape, she was tortured severely. This was done by using steel cables on both the feet and the hands, since these were seen as non-essential parts of a Handmaid (91). Although she was caught quickly in her first attempt at escape, the beatings that she endured only fueled her desire to find a way out of this oppressive society even more. Along with her attempts at escape , she fought against Gilead in a more subtle way, by showing true solidarity among her fellow Handmaids. Although the Republic of Gilead was supposed to be about fostering this solidarity among women, in reality it made all of the women suspicious of each otherShow MoreRelatedThe Handmaid s Tale, By Margaret Atwood1629 Words   |  7 Pages Atwood s novel, The Handmaid s Tale depicts a not too futuristic society of Gilead, a society that overthrows the U.S. Government and institutes a totalitarian regime that seems to persecute women specifically. Told from the main character s point of view, Offred, explains the Gilead regime and its patriarchal views on some women, known as the handmaids, to a purely procreational function. The story is set the present tense in Gilead but frequently shifts to flashbacks in her time at the RedRead MoreThe Handmaid s Tale By Margaret Atwood1733 Words   |  7 Pages The Handmaid’s Tale Analysis The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian novel written by Margaret Atwood in 1985. Dystopian novels often feature societal norms taken to dangerous extremes. Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale contains each and every feature of a typical dystopian novel, though she prefers to refer to it as social science-fiction. Ideological and social conditions taken to extremes enforced by authoritarian regimes, social trends isolated or exaggerated, and stability being secured through impossibleRead MoreThe Handmaid s Tale By Margaret Atwood1744 Words   |  7 PagesProcreation is a driving force that manifests itself differently within the numerous characters in Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s tale. Social classes are structured on the basis of child rearing, and sexuality is used as a tool to control the lives of citizens living within Gileadean society. People of different classes experience different motivating forces in relation to the goal of procreation rat her than simply continuing the civilization. The whole class system is also based entirelyRead MoreThe Novel The Handmaid s Tale 1191 Words   |  5 Pagesmaking them â€Å"handmaids† in the name of religion to cure the infertility of the population. The double entendre diction which exists throughout the whole novel adds subliminal hints on the charactarisation of the characters, such as Offred, and to the story itself, such as the religious political system that governs Gilead, which is a double entendre in itself. These different plays on diction proves the oppression of our main character and proves how powerful language can be. The main character of thisRead MoreMargaret Atwood s The Handmaid s Tale931 Words   |  4 Pagesconcept of gender becoming a multi- layered shifting hypothesis to which society is adapting. Since the 19th-century, philosophers and theorists have continued to scrutinize gender beyond biological and social interpretation. Margaret Atwood s The Handmaid s Tale captures the limitations and social implications forced upon a set gender based on societal expectations. Gender is a social construct that limits the individual to the restrictions and traditions of a society, or if it’s an individuallyRead MoreCritical Analysis : The Handmaid s Tale 1129 Words   |  5 PagesLidiah Zipp College English Critical Analysis Don’t Let the Bastards Get You Complacent Philip Zimbardo, an American psychologist said, â€Å"Bullies may be the perpetrators of evil, but it is the evil of passivity of all those who know what is happening and never intervene that perpetuates such abuse,† (â€Å"Philip Zimbardo Quotes†). In Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, a pair Handmaid’s called Offred and Ofglen, and a wife named Serena Joy, clearly exhibit contrasting examples ofRead MoreThe Handmaids Tale Essay1732 Words   |  7 PagesBrenda Guillen Professor XXX Class November 8, 2017 Then vs. Now, the Realities of of Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ in Modern Day America The novel quot;The Handmaid#39;s Talequot; written by Margaret Atwood in 1985 is a fictional novel about Gilead, a place ruled by male religious fundamentalists who rape women labeled as handmaids to bear children for infertile wives. The society encourages the enslavement of women to control their reproductive rights. While Atwood’s novel depicts a fictionalRead MoreThe Characters of Women in The Handmaids Tale and The Bell Jar1504 Words   |  7 Pagesher profession. We are for breeding purposes. There is supposed to be nothing entertaining about us, no room is to be permitted for the flowering of secret lusts. We are two-legged wombs, thats all: sacred vessels, ambulatory chalices (The Handmaids Tale, p. 176). and I used to think of my body as an instrument, of pleasure, or a means of transportation, or an implement for the accomplishment of my will...There were limits, but my body was nevertheless lithe, single, solid, one with meRead MoreLiterary Analysis of the Handmaids Tale1863 Words   |  8 Pagesthey must learn to suppress their emotions and feelings. In the Republic of Gilead, the main character Offred is a handmaid, which is a fertile woman who is assigned to be a surrogate mother for a woman that is no longer fertile, but is wealthy in society. This occupation was not Offred’s choice as it is seen as a responsibility for a fertile woman to reproduce for the sake of society. Through the character Offred, Atwood demonstrates that if one chooses their own life over society then they will beRead MoreGilead Literary Analysis1885 Words   |  8 Pagesdiscrimination. Similar, the language Gilead uses in the text is a technique of rhetoric to justify and persuade characters into following along with its oppressive ideologies. Atwood also uses language to highlight the oppression of women while exploring the consequences it has on their identity. In the society of Gilead, women are defined only by their gender roles, such as wife or handmaid. The women of Gilead are stripped of their individuality when forced to be renamed and divided into functions

Hume Essay Thesis Example For Students

Hume Essay Thesis David HumeKnowledge is gained only through experience, and experiences only exist in the mind as individual units of thought. This theory of knowledge belonged to David Hume, a Scottish philosopher. Hume was born on April 26, 1711, as his familys second son. His father died when he was an infant and left his mother to care for him, his older brother, and his sister. David Hume passed through ordinary classes with great success, and found an early love for literature. He lived on his familys estate, Ninewells, near Edinburgh. Throughout his life, literature consumed his thoughts, and his life is little more than his works. By the age of 40, David Hume had been employed twice and had failed at the family careers, business and law. Occasionally, he served on diplomatic missions in France and other countries. Humes major work, A Treatise of Human Nature, was not well understood when first published, and received much criticism. The first two volumes were published in 1739, and the third in 1740. Immanuel Kant and other philosophers did notice his work and began respecting Hume for his reasoning. Later, he republished the first and third volumes as An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, and An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals in 1748 and 1751 respectively. The second volume was used as Part 2 of Four Dissertations in 1757. During his lifetime Humes reputation derived from the publication of his Political Discourses (1751) and six-volume History of England (1754-1762), (Langley 415). David Hume discovered he was literary celebrity when visiting France in 1763. He retired to Edinburgh in 1769 and lived a happy life. He passed away August 25, 1776 and left in his will that he only wanted his name and date on his gravestone, leaving it to posterity to add the rest, (Langley 415). Skepticism is the belief that people can not know the nature of things because perception reveals things not as they are, but as we experience them. In other words, knowledge is never known in truth, and humans should always question it. David Hume advanced skepticism to what he called mitigated skepticism. Mitigated skepticism was his approach to try to rid skepticism of the thoughts of human origin, and only include questions that people may begin to understand. Humes goal was to limit philosophical questioning to things which could be comprehended. Empiricism states that knowledge is based on experience, so everything that is known is learned through experience, but nothing is ever truly known. David Hume called lively and strong experiences, perceptions, and less lively events, beliefs or thoughts. Different words and concepts meant different things to different people due to the knowledge, or experiences they have. He believed, along with the fact that knowledge is only gained through experience, that a persons experiences are nothing more than the contents of his or her own consciousness. The knowledge of anything comes from the way it is perceived through the five senses. Hume began to distinguish between feelings and thoughts. Feelings are only impressions made upon the body, and thoughts arrive from impressions; for nothing can be thought that has not been experienced. The meaning of ideas is more important than their truth. Belief results from ideas and assumptions, which are recollected from previous knowledge. Humes analysis of causal relation is that everything that happens beyond what is available to memory rests on assumption. Let us examine two cases: I see lightning and hear thunder; I see a rabbit and then a fox. The question is why I am right in concluding that lightning causes thunder but wrong in believing that rabbits cause foxes. Experience, in both instances, reveals an A that is followed by B, and repeated experiences show that A is always followed by B. While the constant conjunction of A and B might eliminate the rabbit-fox hypothesis, it is of no help in explaining causality because there are all sorts of objects, such as tables and chairs, which are similarly conjoined but not supposed to be causally related. Thus experience reveals only that constant conjunction and priority are sufficient but not necessary conditions for establishing a causal connection. (Langley 417)David Hume was a great philosopher. He was well known for his works and respected by the people of his time. His philosophical reasonings were written down to explain the unknown, to the people who know nothing but what they ha ve experienced. Today philosophers read his material and highly regard his theory of knowledge. Empiricists and skeptics are still improving upon his thoughts. According to David Hume, there is no truth, but humans must continue to seek it by constantly improving upon one another. His theories can be used by ordinary people to improve upon themselves and their culture. .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 , .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .postImageUrl , .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 , .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:hover , .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:visited , .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:active { border:0!important; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:active , .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45 .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf49e1f98397737c7f8da9ccd7ef82c45:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Artificial Intelligence EssayWorks CitedLangley, Raymond J. The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of World Biography. 1973.Hume. Vol. 5. New York, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1973. 415-17. Mannoia, V. James. Building a Christian World View, God, Man, and Knowledge. 1986. Rationalism and Empiricism. Vol. 1. Phillipsburg, New Jersey: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1986. 268-71. The Philosophy of David Hume. 3 May 2000. http://www.angelfire.com/mi/markhelm/.